Not every demo is a buyer
Students, competitors, job seekers and companies far too small book demos too. Counted as conversions, they teach bidding to find more of the same.
B2B SaaS & technology
LinkedIn can cost more per lead and less per opportunity. Zephra creates, runs and improves LinkedIn, Google and Meta Ads for SaaS companies, IT services firms and MSPs, and moves budget on meetings and opportunities, with your approval.
The problem
Students, competitors, job seekers and companies far too small book demos too. Counted as conversions, they teach bidding to find more of the same.
On cost per lead, LinkedIn loses to Google almost every time, even when it produces more opportunities.
Switching from demos to qualified leads is right, but each switch restarts learning. It needs a plan, not a whim.
How it works
Captured with its source, click ID and company details.
The earliest stage that usually predicts value, and arrives inside the platforms’ windows.
Where configured, stages go back to LinkedIn, Google and Meta. Channels are compared on cost per opportunity.
Budget shifts run within spend limits, once approved, and are checked as sales feedback arrives.
See it in action
| Google Ads | LinkedIn Ads | |
|---|---|---|
| Spend | $12,000 | $18,000 |
| Enquiries | 60 | 30 |
| Qualified leads | 17 | 18 |
| Opportunities | 4 | 9 |
| Cost per opportunity | $3,000 | $2,000 |
| Proposed budget | $10,500 | $19,500 |
LinkedIn produces more opportunities here, despite costlier enquiries.
Zephra applies the shift once you approve, keeping Google coverage and total spend unchanged.
Check opportunity cost as sales feedback arrives. Zephra adjusts or reverts the test.
Category and competitor search terms, LinkedIn committees, trial sign-ups that never become pipeline. SaaS demand generation playbook
Local and vertical searches, IT director audiences, long contract cycles and renewals. IT services and MSP playbook
Channels
Professional audiences, saturation and creative fatigue, judged on cost per opportunity.
Google AdsCategory and competitor terms, negative keywords, demo-quality search terms.
Meta AdsWebinar and content retargeting to accounts already in pipeline.
Markets
SaaS and IT firms selling to the US need geography splits and time-zone-aware follow-up, alongside domestic mid-market campaigns.
GCC-wide targeting of senior decision makers, and partner or reseller opportunities that need their own stage.
SQL and opportunity stages, buying committees and LinkedIn-heavy programmes; expect security reviews.
Free assessment
10–15 minutes, no CRM, no campaign changes. What the assessment covers · Security · Pricing
Questions, answered
Yes, with your approval. Zephra compares channels on qualified leads and opportunities from your CRM or spreadsheet, not just cost per lead. It proposes shifts within the spend limits you set and applies them once approved, then checks whether opportunity cost holds as sales feedback arrives.
Zephra works with CRM data or a spreadsheet. What matters is that each lead carries a stage, such as meeting held, sales-accepted or opportunity, and that stages are updated promptly.
Yes. Where configured, Zephra sends CRM lead stages to LinkedIn through the LinkedIn Conversions API, and to Google and Meta through their own routes.
No. Attribution tools report which campaigns influenced pipeline. Zephra creates, runs and improves the campaigns themselves, using lead-quality evidence, within your approvals.
Yes. Start with a demo and bring your questionnaire. The security page explains access, approvals, audit logs and data handling.
Start with your account
The free assessment reviews LinkedIn, Google and Meta Ads for wasted spend, structure, constraints and measurement gaps.